ComparisonMapsPrivacy

Compare: Google Maps, Waze and a Self‑Hosted OSM Stack — Which Fits Your Fleet?

sselfhosting

2026-02-07

10 min read

Ops guide: compare Google Maps, Waze and a self‑hosted OSM routing stack — features, operational costs, privacy and offline strategies for fleets.

Hook — Why ops teams can't afford the wrong map

Choosing between Google Maps, Waze or a self‑hosted OSM stack is no longer an academic question for fleet ops. You're balancing real tradeoffs: data privacy, offline availability, predictable operational costs, and the ability to customize routing and POIs for business logic. Pick the wrong approach and you pay more, leak telemetry, or lose service when connectivity or vendor agreements change.

Executive summary — fast verdict for busy teams

Short version for decision-makers:

Google Maps + Waze: Best for teams that want low ops overhead, rich live traffic, and features like incident reporting — at the cost of ongoing variable API spend and limited control over telemetry.
Self‑hosted OSM stack: Best for teams that need strict privacy, offline-first operation, or deep customization (custom road rules, internal POIs, on‑prem routing). Requires engineering and predictable ops budget.
Hybrid: Use Google/Waze for global coverage and fallback, and an on‑prem OSM stack for private routing or offline segments — often the pragmatic winner for fleets shifting toward privacy and cost control.

What ops teams care about (the decision criteria)

To evaluate properly, use these criteria as non‑negotiables:

Functional parity: Does the platform deliver turn‑by‑turn, ETA with traffic, rerouting, and incident awareness?
Operational cost: Not just API fees — also hosting, bandwidth, tile generation, and staff time.
Privacy & compliance: Can you keep telemetry on‑prem and comply with GDPR/CPRA/sector rules?
Offline capability: Can routing and maps work without cellular connectivity?
Customization: Support for private POIs, business rules, speed profiles, HOV lanes, and vehicle constraints.
Reliability & SLAs: Uptime guarantees, recovery plans, and monitoring requirements.

Feature comparison — Google Maps, Waze, and a self‑hosted OSM stack

Routing & traffic

Google Maps: Enterprise‑grade routing with multi-modal options, real‑time traffic, and predictive ETAs. Best for quick integration and global coverage.
Waze: Community‑driven live incident reporting that produces excellent localized traffic insights. Owned by Google; often contributes upstream to Maps but excels at crowd signals (incidents, police, hazards).
Self‑hosted OSM: Routing engines like OSRM, GraphHopper, and Valhalla give you complete control. You get fast routing but must supply traffic data (crowd sources, telematics, or historical heatmaps) and run the compute for live recalculation.

Offline & edge operation

Google/Waze: Mobile SDKs offer offline tiles and limited offline routing but are not optimized for fully disconnected enterprise use (and often have license limits).
Self‑hosted: You can run an entire routing stack on edge hardware ( Raspberry Pi 5, industrial gateways, or local VMs), distribute vector tile bundles and precomputed route graphs, and run routing locally — ideal for tunnels, remote sites, or high‑privacy fleets.

Privacy & telemetry

Google/Waze: Telemetry and incident data flow to Google. If data residency or PII restrictions matter, this is a blocker unless you carefully design what you send.
Self‑hosted: Full control — you decide retention, anonymization, and external sharing. This is why many logistics, utilities, and government fleets choose OSM stacks.

Customization & vendor lock

Google/Waze: Rapid feature set, but limited deep customization (you can't change base routing logic or underlying geometry).
Self‑hosted: You control the routing profiles, turn restrictions, cost models (time vs distance vs fuel), and POI layers. More work, but no lock‑in.

Operational cost: how to model and a sample comparison (2026 lens)

Costs break down into three buckets: variable API fees, infrastructure & bandwidth, and operational labor. Below is a transparent model you can adapt.

Assumptions (example model you can reuse)

Fleet: 500 vehicles
Route calls per vehicle: 2 per day (one outbound, one inbound) — 365 days
Total route calls/year: 500 * 2 * 365 = 365,000
Geocoding / POI lookups: 1 per route (365,000/year)
Tile traffic per vehicle: 50 MB/month (vector tiles cached on device where possible)

Google/Waze (example calculation)

Use your vendor invoices to replace the per‑unit assumptions. For example purposes only, consider two representative per‑request costs in 2026 market ranges:

High‑feature route (traffic, ETA): $0.01 per route request
Geocoding: $0.005 per request

Computed annual costs:

Routing: 365,000 * $0.01 = $3,650/year
Geocoding: 365,000 * $0.005 = $1,825/year
Mobile/tiles data: 500 * 50 MB/mo * 12 = ~300 GB/year (data egress billed to mobile carrier — often included in fleet plans)

Total example: ~$5,500/year in API calls — plus hidden costs like extra API hits from retries, SDK telemetry, and premium features. For larger fleets the per‑call model scales linearly and can reach tens of thousands per year or more.

Self‑hosted OSM (example calculation)

Self‑hosting shifts costs from per‑call variable fees to predictable infrastructure and people costs. Example stack components and first‑year costs (illustrative):

Compute: One small cluster — 3 x 4 vCPU, 16 GB RAM cloud VMs for routing and tile serving: $300–$900/month depending on provider and redundancy.
Storage: PostGIS & vector tile storage (100–500 GB) on managed disks: $20–$200/month.
Bandwidth: If vehicles fetch tiles from central servers: 300 GB/year = typically <$50/year on most cloud providers; but enterprise egress or global fleets increase this significantly.
Operational labor: 0.1–0.5 FTE for maintenance, updates, and monitoring. Estimate $10k–$60k/year depending on skill mix and automation.
Edge hardware (optional): Raspberry Pi 5 image builders or industrial gateways for offline: $60–$200 per device one‑time or $3–$20/month amortized.

Typical annual range (excluding labor): $4,000–$18,000. Add labor and you'll match or exceed hosted API spend quickly — but you gain privacy and unlimited customization, and costs stabilize (no per‑call surprises).

Key takeaway on cost

The tipping point is predictable usage and the value of privacy/customization. For small fleets with low route volumes, Google/Waze can be cheaper overall and far lower ops. For medium and large fleets with high call volumes, strict privacy requirements, or need for offline operation, self‑hosting often becomes cheaper and gives control.

Operational design patterns for fleet use

Cloud‑only (fastest to market)

Use Google Maps Platform for routing and traffic, Waze for incident signals, Map SDKs on mobile clients.
No routing servers to maintain. Focus ops on API keys, quotas, and cost monitoring.

Edge‑first (offline, privacy, resilience)

Generate regional vector tiles and precompute contraction hierarchies or CH graphs.
Distribute tile and graph bundles to devices. Run an embedded router (GraphHopper offline mode, Valhalla, or OSRM compiled for device) on Raspberry Pi 5 / industrial gateways.
Synchronize telemetry back to HQ when connectivity is available; anonymize locally.

Hybrid (best of both worlds)

Primary routing is self‑hosted for privacy/low latency. Use Google/Waze as a fallback for unexpected conditions or coverage gaps, or to augment traffic data.
Use an intelligent gateway to poison or limit what leaves the vehicle (anonymize session IDs, throttle location frequency).

Recommended stacks by use case (2026, practical picks)

Small private fleet (≤100 vehicles), offline needs, minimal ops

Hardware: Raspberry Pi 5 or an NUC per vehicle if needed.
Server: Single VM to host vector tiles and routing graphs.
Software: GraphHopper for offline mode, MapLibre GL for rendering, OpenMapTiles for vector tiles, Nominatim for occasional geocoding.
Benefits: Low cost, offline operation, easy updates via OTA bundle distribution.

Medium fleet (100–1000 vehicles) with custom routing rules

Server: Kubernetes cluster with autoscaling (3+ nodes), Postgres/PostGIS for OSM data, TileServer GL (or tileserver‑ng), and a routing tier with OSRM or Valhalla.
Extras: Redis caching, S3/Blob storage for tile bundles, Prometheus/Grafana for monitoring, and an ingress with mutual TLS for vehicle authentication.
Benefits: Scalability, HA, easier integration with internal dispatch systems.

Large fleet (>1,000 vehicles) or multi‑region operations

Architecture: Distributed edge caches per region, central graph generation pipeline, CDN for tiles, multiple routing clusters close to regional pop centers.
Software choices: Valhalla for advanced routing features (multimodal), OSRM for pure speed, GraphHopper for memory‑efficient CH approaches. Use Pelias or Photon for high‑quality geocoding scaling.
Operational focus: CI/CD for map updates, automated OSM diffs ingestion (weekly or daily), canary deployments for routing logic changes.

Security, compliance and maintainability checklist

Secure API endpoints with mTLS and token rotation.
Implement strict telemetry retention and anonymization policies.
Automate OSM updates using planet diffs or regional extracts — test updates in staging before production.
Back up PostGIS DB and routing graphs; store backups offsite with retention policy.
Monitor latencies, route error rates, and tile cache hit ratios. Set alerts for route‑latency spikes.
Document rollback procedures for routing profile changes (speed vs access rules).
Legal: comply with ODbL attribution requirements when using OSM data publicly.

2026 trends and how they change the decision

Late 2025 and early 2026 brought practical shifts that affect your choice:

Edge compute proliferation: Devices like Raspberry Pi 5 plus consumer AI HATs make on‑device routing and ML feasible. This accelerates offline-first architectures for fleets.
Vector tiles & compression: Vector tiles are cheaper to distribute and easier to cache. Improved compression reduces bandwidth costs for remote vehicles.
Privacy regulation and corporate risk: Stricter data governance (privacy regs and CISO scrutiny) is pushing organizations toward self‑hosted or hybrid models where telemetry never leaves corporate control.
Open routing innovation: Projects like Valhalla and GraphHopper have matured, offering features that previously required commercial APIs.
Hybrid vendor models: Expect more vendors to offer 'private maps' or hybrid connectors where you supply the map server and they supply traffic overlays under contract. See operational playbooks on edge auditability for governance patterns.

Practical action plan — what to do next (30/60/90 day roadmap)

30 days: Verify requirements and run a cost proof

Capture current API usage (calls/day, geocoding vs routing vs tiles) across the fleet.
Define privacy and offline SLAs: what data must stay on‑prem and what can be sent.
Run a cost comparison using your actual call counts vs vendor pricing.

60 days: Prototype

Spin up a single OSM stack: PostGIS + tiles + OSRM/GraphHopper on a small VM.
Deploy a test vehicle image (Pi5 or emulator) with vector tiles + offline router.
Measure latency, routing parity, and the effort to onboard custom POIs.

90 days: Decide and operationalize

Choose one of three paths: Cloud‑only, Edge‑first, or Hybrid.
Automate map updates, add monitoring, and document runbooks.
Start a pilot with a controlled group of vehicles and iterate.

Operational risks and mitigation

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them:

Underestimating update complexity: OSM diffs and routing graph rebuilds can be CPU heavy. Mitigate with a staged CI pipeline and scheduled rebuild windows.
Hidden bandwidth costs: If devices constantly fetch tiles, egress can spike. Use aggressive caching, compact vector tiles, and prefetch strategies.
Skill gap: Self‑hosted stacks need GIS and infra skills. Outsource initial setup or hire a consultant to accelerate maturity.

"If privacy, offline capability and customization are core requirements, treat self‑hosting as a product — instrument it, own it, and budget for continuous improvement."

Actionable takeaways

If you need minimal ops and fastest time-to-market: start with Google Maps + Waze, but lock down what telemetry you send and monitor costs monthly.
If you need strict privacy, offline operation, or deep customization: plan for a self‑hosted OSM stack and budget for engineering and monitoring. Start with a prototype using GraphHopper + vector tiles.
For most enterprise fleets in 2026, the right long‑term strategy is hybrid: run private routing for critical segments and use Google/Waze for overflow and global coverage.

Next steps & call to action

Ready to evaluate your fleet objectively? Start with a free 30‑day template we use in ops audits: a cost model spreadsheet, checklist for privacy controls, and a reference Kubernetes manifest for an OSM stack. If you prefer hands‑off, schedule a technical review with a mapping infrastructure expert to scope a 90‑day pilot aligned to your fleet size and regulatory needs.

Decide with data — prototype, measure, then commit.

selfhosting

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.